Isolationism
|
|
Summary This topic is NOT part of the current AQA syllabus, but I have kept it in because it is important background knowledge. In the early 20th century, the USA generally tried to keep out of international affairs, and this attitude was called 'isolationism'. The page decribes the US Senate's refusal to ratify the Treaty of Versailles or join the League of Nations i.e. the re-assertion of American isolationism after US involvement in the First World War. There is a traditional explanation of this, that America didn't join the League of Nations because it was 'isolationist'. This is the simplistic view that you will find in most textbooks. However, the interpretation of modern historians is that neither Americans not the Senate were really isolationist AT ALL, and that the Treaty was lost rather by Wilson's stupidity.
Source AWhat did isolationism mean in practice? REJECTION OF THE PEACE TREATIES Under the US Constitution, peace treaties have to be agreed by the Senate one of the elected houses of the US Congress (Parliament). The Senate was isolationist and would not agree to the Treaty of Versailles because it involved joining the League of Nations. The Treaty, into which Wilson had put so much, was rejected. The USA never joined the League of Nationss. Allan Todd, Collins Total Revisions (2002) .
|
Going DeeperThe following links will help you widen your knowledge: Important introductry information from BBC Bitesize A brilliant explanation by Ben Walsh of why America refused to join the League of Nations Sources showing why America refused to join Speeches by American politicians
Two modern historians argue that Wilson, not isolationism, killed the Treaty.
Podcast: Giles Hill's podcast on American isolationism
|
The Traditional Explanation [IMAGE]The American people had not wanted to go into World War One America did not join in until 1917 and when the war ended they rejected the Treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations. This is called 'isolationism' the desire to keep out of foreign affairs. American people were isolationist because:
|
Source BWe are not internationalists, we are American nationalists Theodore Roosevelt, speaking in 1919.
Source CSenator Borah's speech We have entangled ourselves with all European concerns dabbling in their affairs. In other words, we have surrendered, once and for all, the great policy of "no entangling alliances" upon which this Republic has been founded for 150 years. [Acting according to the decisions of a League] is in conflict with the right of our people to govern themselves free from all restraint of foreign powers.... A real republic can not commingle with the discordant and destructive forces of the Old World. You can not yoke a government of liberty to a government whose first law is that of force. India, sweltering in ignorance and burdened with inhuman taxes after more than one hundred years of dominant rule; Egypt, trapped and robbed of her birthright; Ireland, with 700 years of sacrifice for independence this is the atmosphere in and under which we are to keep alive our belief in democracy. Senator Borah (19 November 1919). Borah, a Republican Senator and isolationist, was speaking in the Senate debate abut the Treaty. India, Egypt and Ireland were in the British Empire
|
EVENTS the Political Battle
|
Consider:Isolationism/ Money/ American soldiers/ German immigrants/ Empire - can you see any of these prejudices influencing Senator Borah's speech in Source C?
|
The View of Modern HistoriansModern historians deny that America rejected the Treaty because of isolationism. They point out that:
So why then did the Treaty fail? simply, say modern historians, because of Wilson stupidity:
|
Source DThe stage is set, the destiny disclosed. It has come about by no plan of our conceiving, but by the hand of God. We cannot turn back. The light streams on the path ahead, and nowhere else. Wilson's speech to Congress (10 July 1919).
Source EContemptible, narrow, selfish, poor little minds that never get anywhere but run around in a circle and think they are going somewhere. Woodrow Wilson, speaking in 1919, describing what he thought about those people who wanted to stay out of world affairs.
|
|